The reality of applying the electronic governance principles: A survey study in a Sample from Iraqi banks governmental
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aims at describing and identifying the electronic governance principles. It was tested at the Iraqi banks represented by Al-Rafidain bank branches group, the central Iraqi bank, agricultural and, industrialbank. On a simple including (269) person holding various administrative positions with the scientific qualification (Diploma and above) Where (350) forms were distributed, and (296) were returned. The researcher has used the questionnaire as a main method in data collection and the personal interviews as well. The study also tried to test certain hypotheses in relation to adopting the electronic governance principles in Iraqi banks. To answer the research questions related to the problem of the study and to manipulate the data collectedcertain statistical methods have been usedsuch as (to reach the aimsattempted to recognize the scope of the organizational identification effect implying (emotional, cognitive and evaluative) which is regarded as an independent variable in the application of the electronic governance principles as a dependent variable represented by (mean, the Standard deviation, Shapiro-Wilk). The results obtained show that there is a variation in the level of applying the electronic governance principles in the stated banks which means that the results confirmed the hypotheses. Depending on the results, the current study has come up with some recommendations and the most prominent is to interest in theelectronic governance principles by the banks and the field results also show a variation in the principles thus if the banks wish to to achieve the benefit from the services provided to all beneficiaries, they have to lay programs and steps which ensure thattheelectronic governance principlesshould be applied perfectly.
Downloads
Article Details
References
اولاا. المصادر العربية:
حمادي، صالح مهدي، وابراهيم، عمار غازي، وعبد الكريم، نزار معن، ) 2122 )، تأثير الحوكمة
الالكترونية في جودة التدقيق، بحث تطبيقي في المنظمات الاقتصادية، مجلة الاقتصاد وعلوم
الادارة، جامعة ديالى.
شلبي، صبري احمد، ) 2122 (، دور الحوكمة في الاصلح الاداري: دراسة مقارنة بين الدنمارك
ولبنان، رسالة ماجستير.
الهروط، العنود ابراهيم، ) 2122 (، الاتجاهات نحو تطبيق الحوكمة الالكترونية في الجامعات
الخاصة الاردنية وأثرها في تميز الاداء الجامعي: دراسة ميدانية، رسالة ماجستير، جامعة الشرق
الاوسط، الاردن.
/9/03 : جامعة تكريت/كلية الإدارة والاقتصاد/مجلة تكريت للعلوم الإدارية والاقتصادية/المجلد 71 /العدد 55 /ج 7
زدام، يوسف، ( 2122 (، المشاركة الالكترونية-نحو مفهوم يتجاوز التغريد، مجلة العلوم
.) الاقتصادية، المجلد ) 22 (، العدد ) 22
صلح الدين، احمد ضياء الدين، وعطية، طارق طعمة، ( 2122 (، الحوكمة الالكترونية ودورها
في نجاح استراتيجيات التغيير التنظيمي: دراسة ميدانية في ديوان محافظة الانبار، مجلة جامعة
.A- جيهان-اربيل العلمية، العدد ) 2(، الجزء
ثانياا. المصادر الأجنبية:
Abdul Salam, M., (2013), E-Governance for Good Governance Public Service Delivery,
Institute of Governance Studies, BRAC University, Bangladesh.
Almazan, R., S & Garcia, J., R., G., (2012), Are government Internet portals evolving
towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of egovernment
among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 72-81.
Ackerman, J., (2004), Co-governance for accountability: Beyond ‘‘exit’’ and ‘‘voice’’.
World Development 32 (3), 447-463, doi: 10.1016/j. worlddev, 2003, 6, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.015
Ayagre, P., (2015), Internal Audit Capacity to Enhance Good Governance of Public
Sector Organizations: Developing Countries Perspective.JGD.Vol.11, Issue1, p.p.39-60.
Boseke, L., (2017), Information Sharing, Transparency, and E-Governance among
County Government Offices in Sou the asternMichigan. All NMU Master's Thesis.
Codagnone, C. & Undheim, T.A., (2008), benchmarking e-government: Tools, theory,
and practice, European Journal of epractice, 4, 4-18.
Deller, R., & Guilloux, V., (2008), determining relevance of “best practice” based on
interoperability in European e-Government initiatives. European Journal of e Practice,
, 80-91.
Fakeeh, K.A., (2016), The E-Governance (E-Cov) information management models.
International Journal of applied information systems, Volume 11(1).
Gil-Garcia, J.R., & Miranda, F.G., (2010), E-government and opportunities for
participation: The case of the Mexican state web portals. In C.G.R eddick (Ed.),
Polities, democracy, and e - government: Participation and Service delivery (pp. 56-74).
Hoque, S.M.S., (2005), E-Governance in Bangladesh: Initiatives and Challenges. Raj
shah. University.ph. D Dissertation.
Hill, Charles W.l., (2003)"International Business-Competing in the Global
Marketplace", 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Irwing, Boston.
Markarava., Y.(2011). Friend Without Benefits: Critical Assessment of the Relationship
between E-governance and Democracy Mid Sweden University.MA thesis.
Millard, J., (2008), E-Government measurement for policy makers, European Journal of
epractice, 4, 19-32.
Oktem, M., Demirhan, K., and Demirhan, H., (2014), The Usage ofE-Governance
Applications by Higher Education Student", Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,
(5), pp.1925-1943.
Reddick, C.G., & Turner, M., (2012), Channel choice and choice and public Service
delivery Canada: Comparing e- government to traditional Service delivery. Government
in Formation Quarterly, 29, 1-11.
/9/03 : جامعة تكريت/كلية الإدارة والاقتصاد/مجلة تكريت للعلوم الإدارية والاقتصادية/المجلد 71 /العدد 55 /ج 7
Savic, D., (2006), E-governance theoretical foundations and practical implications.
Singh, A., and Sharma, V., (2009), E-Governance and E-Government: A study of Some
Initiatives, International Journal of e-Business and e-Government Studies, Vol.1, No.1.
Ubaldi, B.C., (2011), the impact of the Economic and Financial Crisis on e-Government
in OECD Member Countries. European Journal of epractice, 11, 5-18.
West, D. M., (2004), E-government and the transformation of service delivery and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64 (1), 15-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-
2004.00343.