Main Article Content

Luqman Sleman Omar luqman.sleman@uor.edu.krd


Abstract

The present paper offers a procedure for constructing a solvable incomplete block design with claiming diversities t and blocks k, provided that t is a multiple of k. They incorporate relevant illustrations, exceptional examples, a portion grid, and a more concise cyclical design. Those designs are indicated as accessible with high-efficiency blocks for an inclusive range of observation values. This study includes data for comparing wheat varieties using balanced incomplete block design analysis techniques. The data are provided by the Directorate of Agricultural Research, Sulaymaniyah-Bakrjo. The study deals with 9 treatments and 12 blocks. By using the SPSS package version 27. This paper assesses the null hypothesis as:


Null hypothesis (H0): All nine wheat treatment means are equal to each other.


Alternative hypothesis (H1): At least one group mean differs significantly from the others.


The consequences demonstrate statistically significant differences among wheat types and blocks. On the other hand, the present paper suggests expanding the use of balanced, incomplete block design in agricultural experiments. Executives in the Central Office of Statistics should utilize advanced statistical methods to investigate the rise in the quality and quantity of agricultural products. Conducting uninterrupted studies on the agricultural products, especially with the occurrence of the economic and social crisis, by introducing more designs that affect the income of people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Luqman Sleman Omar. (2026). Efficiency of Balanced Incomplete Block Design in Assessing Wheat Productivity. Tikrit Journal of Administrative and Economic Sciences, 22(74 part 1), 842–859. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.22.74.1.41
Section
Articles

References

Abdy, M., & Sanusi, W. (2018). The Application of Algebraic Methods in Balanced Incomplete Block Design. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012123. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012123

Abeynayake, N., & Jaggi, S. (2012). A Review of Block Designs for Test Treatments – Control(s) Comparisons. Journal of Food and Agriculture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4038/jfa.v2i1.3939

Chigbu, P. E., & Ukaegbu, E. C. (2019). The efficiency and optimality characterization of certain six-Treatment Incomplete-Block designs emanating from some quasi-Semi-Latin squares. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 48(5), 1406–1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2017.1414247

Cotton, J. W. (2014). The Balanced Incomplete Block Design (1st ed.). Wiley. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

Das, P., Dutta, G., Mandal, N. K., & Sinha, B. K. (2015). Optimal Covariate Design. Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2461-7_4

Dwivedi, P. K., & Singh, B. (2025). Character Association and Path Coefficient Analysis for Yield Attributing Traits in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 11(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2025/v11i1463

Eid, M. (2020). Genetic Divergence in Advanced Bread Wheat Genotypes for Yield and Its Attributes. Journal of Plant Production Sciences, 9(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpps.2020.157283

Gassner, B. J. (1965). Equal-difference ???????????? designs. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 16(3), 378–380. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1965-0175799-1

Kumar, A., Gaurav, S. S., Singh, T., & Thapa, R. S. (2018). Evaluation of wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) for assessment of character association, path coefficient and cluster analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, Of. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.a-4983

Kumari, M., Kumar, M., Singh, V., Kumar, S. V., & Rathi, M. (2017). Trait association and morphological diversity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 8(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928x.2017.00080.1

Mba, E. I., Chigbu, P. E., & Ukaegbu, E. C. (2021). Evaluating Popular Statistical Properties of Incomplete Block Designs: A MATLAB Program Approach. Mathematics, 9(11), 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9111281

Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments (Eighth Edition). John Wiley & Sons, 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Farshad-Fattahi/post/Need-the-procedure-for-critical-limit-fixation/attachment/59d6459179197b80779a0aa7/AS%3A453901993418752%401485230076186/download/Douglas-C.-Montgomery-Design-and-Analysis-of-Experiments-Wiley-2012.pdf

Neha, Yadav, A., & Verma, S. (2022). Multivariate Analysis in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for Yield and Yield Contributing Traits. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 1143–1147. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i1030910

Parker, E. T. (1963). Remarks on balanced incomplete block designs. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 14(5), 729–730. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1963-0154822-2

Patterson, H. D., & Hunter, E. A. (1983). The efficiency of incomplete block designs in National List and Recommended List cereal variety trials. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 101(2), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002185960003776x

Thompson, W. A. (1956). A Note on the Balanced Incomplete Block Designs. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27(3), 842–846. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728192